"An ignorant man is always a slave." ~ Anonymous
Today is reflected ignorance and Sula wise response. In particular I thought the fact that there are several people who are forced to intervene when their work is necessary, such as judges and doctors, and then by analogy I was wondering if the expert is expected to take it if you come across [voice of the verb bump] in an ignorant person to wrest it from the darkness in which find and bring in the light of knowledge. This creates several problems first and foremost the value of ignorance, it is therefore necessary to distinguish at least in broad outline the various forms of ignorance. indifferent Ignorance is the kind of ignorance that is only because you have never done anything to inform themselves and then it is neither positive nor negative, example: I do not know the rules of the bridge that I do not create any kind of discomfort or advantage. blissful ignorance or ignorance that produces benefits, examples: the ignorance of surprise preparataci friends, ignorance of the fact that he suffers from a fatal disease
. Ignorance evil ignorance causing damage or endangering the safety of the ignorant, examples: someone driving a car without knowing how to steer or brake, those who use explosives without due care. A
qusto point we return to the original question: the assay is expected to take in case of ignorance? Since it is wise for sure will not intervene in the case ignorance positive, and so far all agree that, if indifferent ignorance offers his knowledge to the ignorant if he refuses to desist from groped and then start the first problem: it should perhaps There? But the biggest stumbling block is the last chance: like the wise man should behave in front of pernicious ignorance? Should by all means try to educate with the use of force? It must act as if the previous offer that is their knowledge and in case of refusal of treatment by the retreat of the ignorant? Must wait on the sidelines that the ignorant reminders his speech?
To you, dear readers, speech and open debate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment